Cmty. Ass'n Underwriters of Am. v. Wacht

Full title: Community Association Underwriters of America, Inc. Plaintiffs, v. Todd…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

No. 20-13177 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

20-13177

11-28-2022

Community Association Underwriters of America, Inc. Plaintiffs, v. Todd Wacht Defendants.

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT (DKT. 36)

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Defendant's motion to approve settlement The Court has reviewed the following document: (Dkt. 36). The Court finds that it should be stricken for the following reason(s):

[√] Missing or insufficient statement of non-concurrence. See LR 7.1(a).

[ ] Over-length. See LR 7.1(d)(3).

[ ] Wrong font size. See LR 5.1(a)(3).

[√] Missing required information (e.g., concise statement of issues, controlling or most appropriate authority, etc.). See LR 7.1(d)(2).

[ ] Improperly formatted (e.g., single-spaced, improper margins, missing page numbers, etc.). SeeLR 5.1(a)(2).

[ ] Does not comply with the Case Management Order in this case for the following reasons:

[√] Other: Defendant's motion to approve settlement does not contain language certifying compliance with LR 5.1(a), as required by the Court's 12/17/2020 order (Dkt. 5). .

Accordingly, the Court strikes the document. Defendant shall file a corrected document that complies with all requirements on or before . 11/30/2022

SO ORDERED.