From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cmty. Ass'n for the Restoration of the Env't v. Nelson Faria Dairy, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
May 16, 2012
No. CV-04-3060-LRS (E.D. Wash. May. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV-04-3060-LRS

05-16-2012

COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. NELSON FARIA DAIRY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

JUDGMENT ON ORDER ON FEES, INTER ALIA

BEFORE THE COURT is the Plaintiff's Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment On Order On Fees (ECF No. 293), and Defendant's Motion To Stay And Approve Bond (ECF No. 307). These motions are heard without oral argument.

The Plaintiff was awarded all of its fees and expenses related to its Motion In Limine To Limit Use Of All Untimely Provided Documents (ECF No. 188). The court reserved ruling on that motion pending trial and, as Plaintiff notes, the court made rulings during trial excluding some of the Defendant's evidence as being untimely. Accordingly, the court cannot justify awarding additional fees with regard to Plaintiff's earlier filed Motion To Compel And Motion To Extend. Plaintiff's Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment On Order On Fees (ECF No. 293) is DENIED.

With denial of this motion, it is anticipated the Defendant will now file a Notice of Appeal with regard to the Judgment entered on the "Order Re CARE's Application For Attorney And Expert Witness Fees And Costs" (ECF Nos. 290 and 291). Defendant has filed a Motion To Stay execution of that Judgment pending appeal upon approval of it posting a supersedeas bond in the sum of $750,000. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d). A district court should attempt to achieve full satisfaction of a judgment in setting a supersedeas bond. Brooktree Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 757 F.Supp. 1101 (S.D. Cal. 1990). The court, however, has inherent discretionary authority in setting the amount of a supersedeas bond. Id. at 1104. Here, the Judgment for fees and costs is $672,178.07. Defendant proposes a $750,000 bond, presumably recognizing that post-judgment interest will continue to accrue while the Judgment is on appeal. The court concludes a higher amount is warranted because post-judgment proceedings are ongoing in this court . Plaintiff has incurred and will continue to incur fees and costs related to those proceedings, in addition to the fees and costs it will incur on appeal before the Ninth Circuit.

Accordingly, along with the Notice of Appeal it intends to file, Defendant will post a supersedeas bond in the sum of $825,000.00. Upon posting of the bond, execution on the Judgment re fees and costs will be stayed pending appeal of that Judgment. Defendant's Motion To Stay And Approve Bond (ECF No. 307) is GRANTED to the extent set forth herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this order and provide copies of the same to counsel of record.

LONNY R. SUKO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cmty. Ass'n for the Restoration of the Env't v. Nelson Faria Dairy, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
May 16, 2012
No. CV-04-3060-LRS (E.D. Wash. May. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Cmty. Ass'n for the Restoration of the Env't v. Nelson Faria Dairy, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, a Washington…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: May 16, 2012

Citations

No. CV-04-3060-LRS (E.D. Wash. May. 16, 2012)