From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CMB Capital Appreciation, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 4, 2011
299 Conn. 925 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

Decided January 4, 2011


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 379 (AC 31523), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly rule that the defendant improperly denied the application when a necessary coordinate approval was not reasonably likely to occur?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly rule that the defendant failed to raise at trial the fact that it denied the application because of the applicant's failure to apply for a wetlands permit, as required by General Statutes § 8-3 (g)?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly rule that there was not sufficient evidence that the proposed site plan provided inadequate access for emergency services?"

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18727.

Edward V. O'Hanlan and Joel C. Norwood, in support of the petition.

Neil R. Marcus and Barbara M. Schellenberg, in opposition.


Summaries of

CMB Capital Appreciation, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 4, 2011
299 Conn. 925 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

CMB Capital Appreciation, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Case Details

Full title:CMB CAPITAL APPRECIATION, LLC v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 4, 2011

Citations

299 Conn. 925 (Conn. 2011)
11 A.3d 150

Citing Cases

Summit Saugatuck, LLC v. Water Pollution Control Auth. of the Town of Westport

The mere fact, however, that a conditional approval of an application would be a viable option available to…

Post Road Iron Works, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency of Town of Greenwich

The agency argues that it needed to know if the related sewer activities would involve a regulated activity.…