From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clyde Skinner v. G T Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1996
232 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 28, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff' appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated November 22, 1995, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained from a defective window while he was replacing windows on the appellant's premises. The plaintiff cannot recover against the appellant under common-law negligence or Labor Law § 200, since he was injured through the dangerous condition which he had undertaken to fix ( see, Kowalsky v Conreco Co., 264 NY 125; Sanders v TDX Constr. Corp., 203 AD2d 353; McCullum v Barrington Co. 309 56th St. Co., 192 AD2d 489). In addition, there is no evidence that the appellant exercised any supervisory control or had any input into how the plaintiffs work was performed ( see, Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d 290).


Summaries of

Clyde Skinner v. G T Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1996
232 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Clyde Skinner v. G T Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE SKINNER, Respondent, v. G T REALTY CORP. OF NEW YORK, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

MILLER v. METROPOLITAN 810 7TH AVE, LLC

Metropolitan and Reckson contend that they owed no duty to plaintiff under Labor Law § 200 or in negligence,…

Gurung v. Arnav re

The Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the defendants' motion which were for summary…