From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clutter v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 20, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-0931.

Submitted September 28, 2010.

Decided October 20, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Crawford County, No. 3-10-07.

Kyle L. Clutter, pro se.


{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Kyle L. Clutter, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Crawford County Court of Common Pleas and Judge Russell B. Wiseman of that court, to resentence him. Clutter has already unsuccessfully sought resentencing by raising a similar claim for writs of mandamus and procedendo. See State ex rel. Clutter v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Mar. 20, 2009), Crawford App. No. 3-09-01. As the court of appeals correctly concluded, res judicata thus barred Clutter from instituting a successive writ action. See State ex rel. Tate v. Calabrese, 125 Ohio St.3d 28, 2010-Ohio-1431, 925 N.E.2d 962.

Judgment affirmed.

BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

LANZINGER, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Clutter v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 20, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Clutter v. Wiseman

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. CLUTTER, APPELLANT, v. WISEMAN, JUDGE, ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

127 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 4987

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Pankey v. D'Apolito

Thus, Respondent's motion to dismiss pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) and 12 (C) is granted. Moreover, res…

State ex rel. Agosto v. Gallagher

{¶ 2} Agosto has already unsuccessfully sought resentencing by raising a similar claim for writs of mandamus…