From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cluster v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Apr 9, 2008
CASE NO.: 5:07cv80/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 5:07cv80/MCR/MD.

April 9, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 6, 2008. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiff's application for attorney fees (doc. 20) is GRANTED as set forth below.

3. Plaintiff's counsel, Byron A. Lassiter, Esquire, is entitled to recover reasonable fees for representing plaintiff before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA); attorney fees in the amount of $2,588.77 under the EAJA are reasonable; and the Commissioner is directed to pay counsel that amount.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cluster v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Apr 9, 2008
CASE NO.: 5:07cv80/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Cluster v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KAREN K. CLUSTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Apr 9, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 5:07cv80/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2008)