Summary
finding claim implementing cataloguing process to facilitate retrieval of documents from storage remotely "fundamentally recit[ed] an abstract idea"
Summary of this case from Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.Opinion
2015-1261 2015-1262
12-17-2015
CLOUD SATCHEL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AMAZON.COM, Defendants-Appellees
DAVID P. SWENSON, Farney Daniels PC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER THOMAS. ABBY M. MOLLEN, Barlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellees. Appellee Barnes & Noble, Inc., also represented by JAMES S. BLACKBURN, Arnold & Porter, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC; Willow White Noonan, San Francisco, CA. Appellee Amazon.com also represented by ADAM MORTARA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL; JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., Seattle, WA.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-00942-SLR-SRF, Judge Sue L. Robinson.
JUDGMENT
DAVID P. SWENSON, Farney Daniels PC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER THOMAS. ABBY M. MOLLEN, Barlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellees. Appellee Barnes & Noble, Inc., also represented by JAMES S. BLACKBURN, Arnold & Porter, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC; Willow White Noonan, San Francisco, CA. Appellee Amazon.com also represent- ed by ADAM MORTARA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL; JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., Seattle, WA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 17, 2015
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court