From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Closson v. Reconstrust Company

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 14, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-00146-KJD-LRL (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-00146-KJD-LRL.

October 14, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the Court is Defendant Real Time Resolutions' Motion to Dismiss (#15). Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiffs have failed to file any response in opposition to Defendant Real Time's motion to dismiss. Therefore, in accordance with Local Rule 7-2(d) and good cause being found, the Court grants the motion to dismiss.

Defendant Real Time Resolutions ("Real Time") services a second mortgage, Home Equity Line of Credit ("HELOC"). The HELOC is never identified or mentioned in Plaintiffs' complaint. The complaint relates exclusively to the first mortgage. Though the complaint asserts Real Estate Settlement Practices Act ("RESPA") violations, there are no allegations involving Real Time, or the HELOC. Furthermore, Real Time did not initiate the foreclosure proceedings or have any involvement with them. In fact, the only allegation in the complaint concerning Real Time is an assertion that Real Time is a Texas corporation with a principal place of business in Texas. Therefore, Defendant Real Time's motion to dismiss is granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Real Time Resolutions' Motion to Dismiss (#15) is GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant Real Time Resolutions and against Plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Closson v. Reconstrust Company

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 14, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-00146-KJD-LRL (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Closson v. Reconstrust Company

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN CLOSSON, Plaintiff, v. RECONSTRUST COMPANY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-00146-KJD-LRL (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2011)