From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cloninger v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV
Jun 20, 2018
2018 Ark. App. 373 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. CR-17-841

06-20-2018

CHRISTOPHER CLONINGER APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Potts Law Office, by: Gary W. Potts, for appellant. One brief only.


APPEAL FROM THE LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 40CR-15-43] HONORABLE ALEX GUYNN, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

Christopher Cloninger appeals from his Lincoln County Circuit Court convictions for first-degree battery and second-degree battery. Appellate counsel has filed a motion with this court to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k) (2017), as well as an accompanying no-merit brief containing an abstract and addendum of the proceedings below. Counsel notes that the sole adverse ruling made at trial was the denial of Cloninger's motion for directed verdict. Counsel explains in the argument portion of his brief why there is nothing in the record that would arguably support an appeal. Cloninger was provided with a copy of his counsel's brief and motion and informed of his right to file pro se points, but he has not done so.

Appellate counsel cites Anders, supra, and Rule 4-3(k) in his jurisdictional statement and in his motion to be relieved, but he cites neither in the body of his brief. Including those citations within the appellate brief is not required by law, but our court has frequently noted that to do so would be the better practice. See, e.g., Coleman v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 61; Rimmer v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 30; Edwards v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 7. --------

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. See Wright v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 300, at 1-2; Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904 (1994). From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with Rule 4-3(k) and conclude that there is no merit to an appeal.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GLADWIN and GLOVER, JJ., agree.

Potts Law Office, by: Gary W. Potts, for appellant.

One brief only.


Summaries of

Cloninger v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV
Jun 20, 2018
2018 Ark. App. 373 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Cloninger v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CLONINGER APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV

Date published: Jun 20, 2018

Citations

2018 Ark. App. 373 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Wagner v. State

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but whether an appeal would…