From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clinton v. Brown

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2009
No. 2:09-cv-1273 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-1273 JFM (HC).

May 26, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Alameda County Superior Court. (Petition, at 7-13.) While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Alameda County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.


Summaries of

Clinton v. Brown

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2009
No. 2:09-cv-1273 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Clinton v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DOUGLAS CLINTON, JR., Petitioner, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-1273 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2009)