Opinion
No. 2012–763KC.
2014-05-29
Present: PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered February 28, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from and as limited by the brief, denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant alleged that it had timely denied the claims at issue based upon plaintiff's assignor's failure to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations. The court stated that the only issue for trial was “the proper mailing of the denials.”
In support of its motion, defendant submitted an affidavit by its no-fault litigation examiner which established that the denial of claim forms had been timely mailed in accordance with defendant's standard mailing practices and procedures ( see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v. Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 A.D.3d 1123 [2008]; Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v. Chubb Group of Ins., 17 Misc.3d 16, 847 N.Y.S.2d 322 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007] ). In view of the foregoing, and as plaintiff has not challenged the Civil Court's finding, in effect, that defendant is otherwise entitled to judgment, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted ( see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 A.D.3d 720 [2006] ).