Cline v. State

Full title: Jacob D. CLINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

588 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107488

10-01-2019

Jacob D. CLINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Christian Lehmberg, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7 Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Christian Lehmberg, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7 Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Colleen Dolan, C.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Jacob D. Cline ("Movant") appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts one point on appeal. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).