Opinion
No. 108,307.
2013-03-8
Phillip G. CLINE, Sr., Appellant, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY, Kansas, by and through the Board of County Commissioners, Appellee.
Appeal from Jefferson District Court; Janice D. Russell, Senior Judge, assigned. Kenji S. Zweygardt, of Zweygardt Law Office, of Oskaloosa, for appellant. Kevin D. Case and Patric S. Linden, of Case & Roberts P.C., of Kansas City, Missouri, for appellee.
Appeal from Jefferson District Court; Janice D. Russell, Senior Judge, assigned.
Kenji S. Zweygardt, of Zweygardt Law Office, of Oskaloosa, for appellant. Kevin D. Case and Patric S. Linden, of Case & Roberts P.C., of Kansas City, Missouri, for appellee.
Before MALONE, C.J., McANANY, J., and KNUDSON, S.J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Phillip Cline appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The parties are well acquainted with the standards for considering a motion for summary judgment. They can be found in Osterhaus v. Toth, 291 Kan. 759, 768, 249 P3d 888 (2011). We apply those same standards in our de novo consideration of the defendant's summary judgment motion.
We have thoroughly examined the record on appeal, including the district court's comprehensive, well-reasoned, and well-drafted memorandum opinion granting summary judgment on Cline's claims. The district court's memorandum opinion fully explains the court's analysis of Cline's claims. We find no fault with the district court's analysis or its conclusion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 7.042(b)(5) ( 2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 63).
Affirmed under Rule 7.042(b)(5).