From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clifton v. Freeman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
Case No. 3:12-cv-171-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-171-KRG-KAP

12-03-2012

DEREK A. CLIFTON, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MICHAEL FREEMAN, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The motion at docket no. 5 was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(3), and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 7, 2012, docket no. 6, recommending that plaintiff's motion be denied.

The plaintiff was notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff has not filed objections, and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2012, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, docket no. 5, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Derek A. Clifton HP-2615

S.C.I. Dallas

1000 Follies Road

Dallas, PA 18612


Summaries of

Clifton v. Freeman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
Case No. 3:12-cv-171-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Clifton v. Freeman

Case Details

Full title:DEREK A. CLIFTON, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MICHAEL FREEMAN, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-171-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)