From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cliffside Park Imaging & Diagnostic Ctr. v. Aetna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Feb 13, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-5868 (WJM) (D.N.J. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-5868 (WJM)

02-13-2013

CLIFFSIDE PARK IMAGING & DIAGNOSTIC CENTER Plaintiff, v. AETNA, Defendant.


ORDER

A Report and Recommendation was filed on January 28, 2013 recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand be granted; and the parties having been given notice that they had fourteen days to object to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(c)(2); no objection or responses having been received; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo; and good cause appearing;

It is on this 13th day of February, 2013

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate-Judge Mark Falk is hereby adopted as the Opinion of this Court; it is further

ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of New Jersey.

________

WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Cliffside Park Imaging & Diagnostic Ctr. v. Aetna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Feb 13, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-5868 (WJM) (D.N.J. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Cliffside Park Imaging & Diagnostic Ctr. v. Aetna

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFSIDE PARK IMAGING & DIAGNOSTIC CENTER Plaintiff, v. AETNA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-5868 (WJM) (D.N.J. Feb. 13, 2013)