From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clifford Fischer v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 1, 2008
No. 05-08-00614-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 1, 2008)

Summary

In Bishop v. Fischer, 94 Kan. 105, 145 P. 890, Mr. Justice Burch said: " The action of mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal, nor in any case where a plain and adequate remedy at law exists."

Summary of this case from Mobil Oil Corporation v. McHenry

Opinion

No. 05-08-00614-CV

Opinion Filed July 1, 2008.

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 05-00280.

Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The Court GRANTS the parties' June 20, 2008 joint motion to dismiss this appeal. We DISMISS this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.


Summaries of

Clifford Fischer v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 1, 2008
No. 05-08-00614-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 1, 2008)

In Bishop v. Fischer, 94 Kan. 105, 145 P. 890, Mr. Justice Burch said: " The action of mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal, nor in any case where a plain and adequate remedy at law exists."

Summary of this case from Mobil Oil Corporation v. McHenry
Case details for

Clifford Fischer v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFORD FISCHER COMPANY D/B/A FISCHER COMPANY, Appellant v. MICHAEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jul 1, 2008

Citations

No. 05-08-00614-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 1, 2008)

Citing Cases

Mobil Oil Corporation v. McHenry

This jurisdiction is plenary and may be exercised to control the action of inferior courts, over whom the…

State ex Rel. Goldstein v. District Court

(See, also, Hammond v. District Court, 30 N.M. 130, 228 P. 758, 39 A.L.R. 1490; Rorick v. Stilwell, 101 Fla.…