From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clevinger v. Intel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 14, 2007
254 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2007)

Summary

holding that the plaintiff's "temporary cancer-related psychological impairment that required a leave of absence for approximately four months [was] not of 'sufficient duration' to qualify as a disability" where the plaintiff stated that after her leave of absence she no longer suffered from the impairment and that medicine excellently controlled her symptoms

Summary of this case from Marquez v. Glendale Union High Sch. Dist.

Opinion

No. 05-17238.

Submitted November 9, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 14, 2007.

Michael D. Moberly, Esq., Andrea G. Lisenbee, Esq., Ryley Carlock Applewhite PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Roger G. Strand, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-02564-RGS.

Before: THOMAS, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Clevinger fails to demonstrate that she has a record of a disability within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2) because her depression did not substantially limit her in a major life activity. See Coons v. Sec'y of U.S. Dept. of Treasury, 383 F.3d 879, 886 (9th Cir. 2004). A temporary cancer-related psychological impairment that required a leave of absence for approximately four months is not of "sufficient duration" to qualify as a disability. See Sanders v. Arneson Prods., Inc., 91 F.3d 1351, 1354 (9th Cir. 1996); see also 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 app. § 1630.2(j) ("[t]emporary, non-chronic impairments of short duration, with little or no long term or permanent impact, are usually not disabilities."). Clevinger's depression was temporary and resulted in her absence from work for approximately eight weeks. In her deposition, Clevinger stated that from June 2003 onwards she did not suffer from depression and that medicine excellently controlled her symptoms. Therefore, she does not qualify as a member of the ADA's protected class. AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Clevinger v. Intel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 14, 2007
254 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2007)

holding that the plaintiff's "temporary cancer-related psychological impairment that required a leave of absence for approximately four months [was] not of 'sufficient duration' to qualify as a disability" where the plaintiff stated that after her leave of absence she no longer suffered from the impairment and that medicine excellently controlled her symptoms

Summary of this case from Marquez v. Glendale Union High Sch. Dist.
Case details for

Clevinger v. Intel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Allyn CLEVINGER, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a California…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2007

Citations

254 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Marquez v. Glendale Union High Sch. Dist.

Such a temporary injury with no residual effects cannot be the basis for a sustainable disability…