From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 11, 1990
577 A.2d 715 (Conn. 1990)

Opinion

Decided July 11, 1990


The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 610, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that because there was sufficient contact with Connecticut by the plaintiff truck driver and his employer, both being domiciled in New Jersey, to give this state jurisdiction, the Connecticut workers' compensation law, both procedural and substantive, should apply?

"Should the Appellate Court have dismissed the appeal suo motu for lack of a final administrative determination?"

Robert E. Beach, in support of the petition.

Dennis A. Ferdon, in opposition.


Summaries of

Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 11, 1990
577 A.2d 715 (Conn. 1990)
Case details for

Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CLEVELAND v. U.S. PRINTING INK, INC., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 11, 1990

Citations

577 A.2d 715 (Conn. 1990)
216 Conn. 802

Citing Cases

Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.

Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc., supra, 617-18. We subsequently granted the defendants' petition for…