From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. Tel. Rd. Holdings

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 7, 2021
CV 21-07043-SK (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

CV 21-07043-SK

12-07-2021

Eric Cleveland v. Telegraph Road Holdings, LLC, et al


Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

For the reason checked below, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause on or before December 21, 2021 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

x Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff has failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on all Defendants.
Plaintiff can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cleveland v. Tel. Rd. Holdings

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 7, 2021
CV 21-07043-SK (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Cleveland v. Tel. Rd. Holdings

Case Details

Full title:Eric Cleveland v. Telegraph Road Holdings, LLC, et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

CV 21-07043-SK (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)