From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. Lim

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:21-cv-05212-VAP-PLA (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-05212-VAP-PLA

12-29-2021

Eric Cleveland v. Bong Sang LIM et al

Christine Chung


Christine Chung

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE: VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGEr

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF

PROSECUTION (IN CHAMBERS)

Plaintiff(s) is hereby ordered to show cause in writing not later than January 31, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

- Plaintiff's filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment

In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to timely respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action.


Summaries of

Cleveland v. Lim

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:21-cv-05212-VAP-PLA (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Cleveland v. Lim

Case Details

Full title:Eric Cleveland v. Bong Sang LIM et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-05212-VAP-PLA (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)