From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. City of Brighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02670-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02670-MSK-KLM

01-15-2013

KINDRA CLEVELAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BRIGHTON, COLORADO; CLINT BLACKHURST, in his individual and official capacities; VALERIE RICE, in her individual and official capacities; MICHELLE (KANEY) HATHEWAY, in her individual and official capacities; CHRIS LESH, in his individual and official capacities; NICHOLAS STRUCK, in his individual and official capacities; DOUG IMFELD, in his individual and official capacities; FRANK ACOSTA, in his individual and official capacities; and CHAD WOOTEN, in his individual and official capaciies, Defendants.


Honorable Marcia S. Krieger


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants With Prejudice (Motion) (#14) filed January 15, 2013. Having reviewed the Motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Any and all claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Defendants are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own attorney fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

___________

Marcia S. Krieger

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cleveland v. City of Brighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02670-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Cleveland v. City of Brighton

Case Details

Full title:KINDRA CLEVELAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BRIGHTON, COLORADO; CLINT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02670-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 15, 2013)