From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. Adger

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 26, 2018
No. 18-6592 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6592

10-26-2018

GEORGE CLEVELAND, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR JERRY B. ADGER, of the South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services (SCPPPS); THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:17-cv-02112-RBH) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court's order denying as moot his motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition, and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny as unnecessary a certificate of appealability. See Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Cleveland v. Adger

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 26, 2018
No. 18-6592 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Cleveland v. Adger

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE CLEVELAND, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR JERRY B. ADGER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 26, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6592 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)