The rule well recognized is that upon motion to direct a verdict, which is analogous to the demurrer in this case, the evidence must be given the most favorable interpretation in behalf of plaintiff and will not support a judgment against him unless he has failed to provide evidence tending to establish an essential element of his case and failed to prove any fact from which a reasonable inference tending to prove that element may be drawn. Pope, Admx., v. Mudge, 108 Ohio St. 192, 140 N.E. 501; Babbitt v. Say, Admr., 120 Ohio St. 177, 165 N.E. 721; Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Krofta, 125 Ohio St. 126, 180 N.E. 641; Martin, Jr., v. Heintz, 126 Ohio St. 227, 184 N.E. 852. The judgment entry recites that the court finds: