Opinion
22-244-SDD-RLB
05-25-2022
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN v. TAE D. JOHNSON, ET AL.
RULING
CHIEF JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The Court has carefully considered the Motions, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr., on May 10, 2022, to which no objection has been filed.
Rec. Docs. 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Rec. Doc. 8.
The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims alleged in the Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
Rec. Doc. 1.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Agreement Against Secretive Criminals by [Invoking] the National Regulatory Treaties Act (“NIRTA”), Plaintiff's Motion for Humanitarian Reasons or Assure Family Unity in the Public Interest by National Treatment Principal Act (“NTPA”), Plaintiff's Motion for Manifest Injustice Act (“MIA”) or Electronic Filing Act [or] Opposition by Secure Academic Resources Technology Act (“SARTA”), and Plaintiff's Motion for Opposition or Criminal Intent and/or Malicious Against Freedom of Speech, by the Ant's Freedom Act (“TAFA”)are DENIED AS MOOT.
Rec. Doc. 3.
Rec. Doc. 4.
Rec. Doc. 5.
Rec. Doc. 6.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that an IFP appeal in this action cannot be taken in good faith.