From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clerisy Corp. v. Airware Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 20, 2012
12-CV-6396 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

12-CV-6396

09-20-2012

CLERISY CORP., and REED TRANSITION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. AIRWARE HOLDINGS, INC. (d/b/a/ AIRWARE LABS), and CROWN DYNAMICS CORP. Defendants,


ORDER

The Court has received and reviewed letters from counsel requesting permission for the Plaintiffs to file a sur-reply of no more than three pages and for the Defendants to file a one page response to Plaintiffs' sur-reply. Based on the parties' letters, the Court finds that additional briefing on the issue of standing and Clerisy's exclusive license may be beneficial to the determination of the underlying motion to transfer or dismiss. Accordingly, the parties' requests are granted, provided that any additional arguments are confined to the effect of Clerisy's exclusive license on the issue of standing. Plaintiffs are directed to file their sur-reply within five days of the date of this Order, and the Defendants are directed to file their response within three days of their receipt of Plaintiffs' sur-reply.

ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

HON. MICHAEL A. TELESCA

United States District Judge

Dated: Rochester, New York

September 20, 2012


Summaries of

Clerisy Corp. v. Airware Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 20, 2012
12-CV-6396 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Clerisy Corp. v. Airware Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CLERISY CORP., and REED TRANSITION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

12-CV-6396 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2012)