From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemons v. Winn-Dixie Store

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 23, 1968
215 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37608.

October 23, 1968.

Writ of certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Charles C. Hurt, Orlando, for petitioner.

B.C. Pyle, of Whittaker, Pyle Wood, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney's fee is also denied.

CALDWELL, C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and HOPPING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clemons v. Winn-Dixie Store

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 23, 1968
215 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Clemons v. Winn-Dixie Store

Case Details

Full title:RUTH CLEMONS, PETITIONER, v. WINN-DIXIE STORE #78, FIDELITY CASUALTY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 23, 1968

Citations

215 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1968)