From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemente v. Martin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
2:21-cv-1501 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1501 JAM AC P

09-17-2021

MARCELINO CLEMENTE, Plaintiff, v. D. MARTIN, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By findings and recommendations filed September 1, 2021, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days or face dismissal of the case. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has since paid the required filing fee. In light of plaintiff's payment of the filing fee, the September 1, 2021 Findings and Recommendations will be vacated and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The September 1, 2021 Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 7, are VACATED.
2. Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Clemente v. Martin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
2:21-cv-1501 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Clemente v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:MARCELINO CLEMENTE, Plaintiff, v. D. MARTIN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1501 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)