From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clement v. Mandel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 15, 1986
486 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2506.

April 15, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Edmund W. Newbold, Judge.

Marina Barturen, Miami, and Robert Gagniuk, for appellant.

White Brown, Miami, Sullivan, Admire Sullivan and Jack G. Admire, Wellisch, Metzger Stanton and Paul R. Stanton, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


We agree with the appellant that the trial court erred in denying, on the basis of laches, Robert Clement's petition to be determined the lawful heir of Felix S. Solomon. See Sheffield v. Barry, 153 Fla. 144, 14 So.2d 417 (1943). The judgment denying Clement's petition is, accordingly, reversed. On remand, we direct the trial court to consider the other issues raised below which it declined to address, including the effect of the Michigan probate court's vacation of an adoption order entered in 1933. In so doing, the court shall be guided by the principles established in Mott v. First National Bank of St. Petersburg, 98 Fla. 444, 124 So. 36 (1929). See also In re Estate of O'Dea, 29 Cal.App.3d 759, 105 Cal.Rptr. 756 (1973).

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Clement v. Mandel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 15, 1986
486 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Clement v. Mandel

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CLEMENT, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT S. MANDEL, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 15, 1986

Citations

486 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)