Staubus, 2022 WL 17479430, at *6. Minnesota law, like Vermont's, requires plaintiffs “bringing] an action against an educational institution for breach of contract” to establish that “the institution failed to perform on ‘specific promises' it made to the student[.]” Clem v. St. Mary's Univ, of Minn., 2010 WL 773596, at *3 (Minn.Ct.App. Mar. 9, 2010); see also Alsidesv. Brown Inst., Ltd., 592 N.W.2d 468, 473 (Minn.Ct.App. 1999) (“adopt[ing ] the majority rule that a student may bring an action against an educational institution for breach of contract, fraud, or misrepresentation, if it is alleged that the institution failed to perform on specific promises it made to the student and the claim would not involve an inquiry into the nuances of educational processes and theories”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted);