From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleghorn v. Maples

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 18, 1994
1994 OK 7 (Okla. 1994)

Opinion

No. 82681.

January 18, 1994.


ORDER


The petition for writ of certiorari to review a certified interlocutory order is hereby recast cast as an application to assume original jurisdiction for the issuance of a petition for writ of prohibition. Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of prohibition is issued. The trial judge is prohibited from enforcing his order of November 4, 1993, bifurcating the trial of petitioner's cause. Petitioner is entitled to proceed directly against his uninsured motorist insurance carrier and need not first obtain a recovery against the alleged tortfeasor. Keel v. M.F.A. Insurance Company, 553 P.2d 153 (Okla. 1976), Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Company, 662 P.2d 681 (Okla. 1983), Buzzard v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., 824 P.2d 1105 (Okla. 1991), and Buzzard v. McDanel, 736 P.2d 157 (Okla. 1987).

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and HARGRAVE, OPALA, ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cleghorn v. Maples

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 18, 1994
1994 OK 7 (Okla. 1994)
Case details for

Cleghorn v. Maples

Case Details

Full title:EARL LYNN CLEGHORN, PETITIONER, v. TAMARA SUE MAPLES, AND ALLSTATE…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 18, 1994

Citations

1994 OK 7 (Okla. 1994)
1994 OK 7

Citing Cases

Pummill v. Hancock Expl. LLC

As a general rule, the lessee may not deduct from royalty payments the costs of gathering, transportation,…

McCormack v. Town of Granite

These arguments are unpersuasive. Although 12 O.S.Supp. 1995 § 696.4[ 12-696.4], see note 6, supra, provides…