From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleary v. Berryhill

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Sep 30, 2022
5:18-cv-00080-RJC (W.D.N.C. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

5:18-cv-00080-RJC

09-30-2022

BARBARA CLEARY, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees (the “Motion”). (Doc. No. 19). In the Motion, Plaintiff's counsel contends that he is entitled to attorney's fees in the amount of $12,771.89, which represents 25% of Plaintiff's accrued back benefits, to be paid from Plaintiff's back benefits pursuant to section 406(b) of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant “neither supports nor opposes Plaintiff's counsel's request for attorney fees.” (Doc. No. 20).

The Court has reviewed the Motion and supporting exhibits and finds that Plaintiff's counsel has established that he is entitled to attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). For the reasons outlined in Plaintiff's Motion, the Court will grant Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees. (Doc. No. 19).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees, (Doc. No. 19), is GRANTED.

The Commissioner of Social Security is hereby ORDERED to pay to Plaintiff's counsel the sum of $12,771.89 from Plaintiff's back benefits and Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the EAJA fee if $4,250.00 to Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Cleary v. Berryhill

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Sep 30, 2022
5:18-cv-00080-RJC (W.D.N.C. Sep. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Cleary v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA CLEARY, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

5:18-cv-00080-RJC (W.D.N.C. Sep. 30, 2022)