Opinion
No.: C 11-02573 EMC
10-14-2011
CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. BENTLY HOLDINGS CALIFORNIA LP, a California limited partnership, Defendant.
REED SMITH LLP Scott D. Baker Christine M. Morgan Attorneys for Plaintiff Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. HELBPAUN LAW FIRM David M. Helbraun Attorneys for Defendant Bently Holdings California LP
Scott D. Baker (SBN 84923)
Christine M. Morgan SBN 169350)
REED SMITH LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS RE: BENTLY HOLDINGS CALIFORNIA, LP'S MOTION TO
DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate that the briefing schedule on Defendant Bently Holdings California LP's Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Or, In The Alternative, For Failure To State A Claim shall be extended and modified as follows:
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.'s Opposition brief due date is extended from October 17, 2011 to October 24, 2011.
Bently Holdings California LP's Reply brief due date is extended from October 24, 2011 to October 31, 2011.
REED SMITH LLP
Scott D. Baker
Christine M. Morgan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
HELBPAUN LAW FIRM
David M. Helbraun*
Attorneys for Defendant
Bently Holdings California LP
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE