Clean Vision Corp. v. Percy

Full title: CLEAN VISION CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 4, 2023

2:22-cv-01862-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01862-ART-NJK

08-04-2023

CLEAN VISION CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER PERCY, an individual; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendant. CHRISTOPHER PERCY, an individual, Counterclaimant, v. CLEAN VISION CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Counterdefendant. CHRISTOPHER PERCY, an individual, Third-Party Plaintiff v. DANIEL BATES, an individual; DOES I through X, inclusive, Third-Party Defendants.

MARQUIS AURBACH CHTD. Brian R. Hardy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10068 Alexander K. Calaway, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15188 Harry L. Arnold, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15866 Attorney(s) for Clean Vision and Bates LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Dan R. Waite, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4078 Stephen D. Steele, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13965 Attorneys for Christopher Percy

Anne R. Traum United States District Court Judge

MARQUIS AURBACH CHTD.

Brian R. Hardy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10068

Alexander K. Calaway, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15188

Harry L. Arnold, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15866

Attorney(s) for Clean Vision and Bates

LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP

Dan R. Waite, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4078

Stephen D. Steele, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13965

Attorneys for Christopher Percy

ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 65)

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS

Anne R. Traum United States District Court Judge

Plaintiff Clean Vision Corporation (“Clean Vision”, “Plaintiff” or “Counterdefendant”) and Daniel Bates (“Bates” or “Third-Party Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, Marquis Aurbach, and Defendant/Counterclaimant Christopher Percy (“Percy” or “Defendant”) by and through his law firm of record, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, (collectively the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. That the Parties have reach a global resolution in the above-captioned matter;

2. That the above-captioned matter, including but not limited to all claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, and affirmative defenses, be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE;

3. That the Parties each bear their own respective attorney fees and costs;

4. That the Court's Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 28) be vacated;

5. That the $5,000.00 cash bond posted with the State Court by Plaintiff on September 23, 2022, be released to Plaintiff, and disbursed to Percy, in accordance with the terms of the Parties' Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release; and

6. That any pending hearings and deadlines in the above-captioned matter be vacated, and the above-captioned case be CLOSED.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.