From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayton v. Steel Warehouse of Tenn., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jul 13, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00244 (W.D. La. Jul. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00244

07-13-2020

ABRAM CLAYTON AND AMY CLAYTON, Plaintiffs v. STEEL WAREHOUSE OF TENNESSEE, L.L.C, ET AL., Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Claytons's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be REMANDED to the Ninth Judicial District Court, Rapides Parish, Louisiana.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in chambers in Alexandria, Louisiana on this 13th day of June July, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Clayton v. Steel Warehouse of Tenn., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jul 13, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00244 (W.D. La. Jul. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Clayton v. Steel Warehouse of Tenn., LLC

Case Details

Full title:ABRAM CLAYTON AND AMY CLAYTON, Plaintiffs v. STEEL WAREHOUSE OF TENNESSEE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 13, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00244 (W.D. La. Jul. 13, 2020)