From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayton v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Nov 9, 2016
889 N.W.2d 244 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

noting that, when a case constitutes a change in law, a PCR claim based on the new ground of law established by the case must be brought within three years of the case's filing

Summary of this case from Garcia v. State

Opinion

No. 15–1826.

11-09-2016

Sammy Lemorris CLAYTON, Applicant–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent–Appellee.

Webb L. Wassmer of Wassmer Law Office, PLC, Marion, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Thomas J. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Clayton v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Nov 9, 2016
889 N.W.2d 244 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

noting that, when a case constitutes a change in law, a PCR claim based on the new ground of law established by the case must be brought within three years of the case's filing

Summary of this case from Garcia v. State
Case details for

Clayton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Sammy Lemorris CLAYTON, Applicant–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

889 N.W.2d 244 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. State

As Garcia did not file this PCR action within three years of his discovery of J.M.'s affidavit, his claim…

Becerra v. State

In order for an untimely PCR application to fall within the section 822.3 exception, the application must be…