From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayton v. Duplessis

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan
Oct 14, 2005
No. 2:05-CV-60157 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 14, 2005)

Opinion

No. 2:05-CV-60157.

October 14, 2005

Todd J. Weglarz, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

James T. Farrell, Michigan Department of Attorney General Public Employment, Elections, Tort Division, Lansing, MI, Attorney for Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' INITIAL MOTION


Contemporaneous with the filing of their Answer, the Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' claims under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and a Motion for Partial Dismissal. Between the time of the filing of those Motions, and the September 29, 2005 hearing on those Motions, the Court sua sponte remanded Plaintiffs' state law claims. In light of the Court's Order of Partial Remand, and upon the stipulation of counsel, as indicated by their attorneys' signatures below, and the Court being aware of the relevant facts and applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that, in light of the Court's Order of Partial Remand, the Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal is moot, and, therefore, is withdrawn.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims under the fifth amendment are dismissed without prejudice and without cost to either party.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' claims brought under the fourteenth amendment is withdrawn.


Summaries of

Clayton v. Duplessis

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan
Oct 14, 2005
No. 2:05-CV-60157 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Clayton v. Duplessis

Case Details

Full title:REVA CLAYTON, as personal representative of the Estate of VIRGIL SNEED…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan

Date published: Oct 14, 2005

Citations

No. 2:05-CV-60157 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 14, 2005)