From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayton v. Alston

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Oct 28, 2009
CV 309-042 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 28, 2009)

Opinion

CV 309-042.

October 28, 2009


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's grievance procedure and supervisory liability claims, as well as Defendants Georgia Department of Corrections, Washington, Morgan, Lawrence, Adams, Powell, and Calhoun, are DISMISSED from the case.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Clayton v. Alston

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Oct 28, 2009
CV 309-042 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Clayton v. Alston

Case Details

Full title:LUTHER JAMES CLAYTON, Plaintiff, v. MARY ALSTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Oct 28, 2009

Citations

CV 309-042 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 28, 2009)

Citing Cases

Noel v. Hart

As Plaintiff has failed to make this basic showing, his claims against Defendant Hart should be dismissed. An…

Gordon v. Johns

However, an allegation that a grievance was filed with supervisory personnel is an insufficient basis for…