From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claybrook v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 18, 1957
96 So. 2d 313 (Ala. Crim. App. 1957)

Opinion

5 Div. 497.

June 18, 1957.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Tallapoosa County, Albert Hooton, J.

Wilbanks Wilbanks, Alexander City, for appellant.

John Patterson, Atty. Gen., Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Wm. I. Byrd, Alexander City, for appellee.


This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction in a bastardy proceeding. Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, requires an assignment of errors. The lack of such an assignment disposes of this appeal. See Brown v. State, 36 Ala. App. 151, 53 So.2d 633.

Parenthetically and as pure obiter dictum, we wish to state that an examination of the record and a consideration of the appellant's brief fail to disclose reversible error. The newly discovered evidence described to support a new trial was much like that in Keel v. State, 35 Ala. App. 515, 49 So.2d 320, and were we to have had the case on the merits, we doubt that we would have considered the trial court as having abused its discretion in denying a new trial.

The judgment of the circuit court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Claybrook v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 18, 1957
96 So. 2d 313 (Ala. Crim. App. 1957)
Case details for

Claybrook v. State

Case Details

Full title:Calvin CLAYBROOK v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 18, 1957

Citations

96 So. 2d 313 (Ala. Crim. App. 1957)
39 Ala. App. 155