From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayborn v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. C 12-04157 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-04157 WHA

05-08-2013

ALLEN CLAYBORN JR., plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Since filing the complaint in this action in August of 2012, pro se plaintiff Allen Clayborn Jr. has not filed any papers or otherwise made any attempts to move this action forward. The procedural order in this action (Dkt. No. 5) required plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment or remand by the end of December, 2012. No motion was filed. An order dated April 8, 2013 ordered plaintiff to show cause by April 22 why the action should not be dismissed. The April 8 order warned plaintiff that if no response was received the action would be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No response was received. Accordingly, the action is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clayborn v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. C 12-04157 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Clayborn v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN CLAYBORN JR., plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-04157 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)