Summary
In Claybon, the defendant argued the court should have appointed an expert "to present testimony on the most recent studies regarding the development of the human brain."
Summary of this case from Rushing v. StateOpinion
No. 18-0695
04-15-2020
Daniel Maurice CLAYBON, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.
Anne K. Wilson of Anne K. Wilson Law Office, PLLC, Cedar Rapids, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904