Opinion
[H.C. No. 3, October Term, 1955 (Adv.).]
Decided June 22, 1955.
HABEAS CORPUS — Transfer from One Penal Institution to Another — Propriety of. The propriety of a transfer of a prisoner from one penal institution to another by the Superintendent of Prisons, acting under Code (1954 Supp.), Art. 27, secs. 763, 794, is not reviewable on habeas corpus. pp. 631-632
J.E.B.
Decided June 22, 1955.
Habeas corpus proceeding by Edward Joseph Francis Clay against the Warden of the Maryland House of Correction. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.
Application denied.
Before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.
This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Carter, in the Baltimore City Court. The petitioner was convicted upon a plea of guilty, of unauthorized use of an automobile and sentenced on August 30, 1954, to two years in the Maryland Reformatory for Males. The only point raised is as to the legality of his transfer to the House of Correction. Code (1954 Supp.), Art. 27, Secs. 763, 794, confers a measure of discretion upon the Superintendent of Prisons to make transfers of this kind. We have held that the propriety of a transfer is not reviewable on habeas corpus. Bell v. Warden, 207 Md. 618; Hirons v. Warden, 198 Md. 662.
Application denied, with costs.