From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2012
No. CIV S-09-2899 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2899 CKD P

04-25-2012

DEANGELO CLAY, Plaintiff, v. J. WALKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 66) is denied.

_________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Clay v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2012
No. CIV S-09-2899 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Clay v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:DEANGELO CLAY, Plaintiff, v. J. WALKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2899 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012)