From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jun 30, 2005
Case No. 5:04-CV-1262, [Resolving Doc. No. 33, 37] (N.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 5:04-CV-1262, [Resolving Doc. No. 33, 37].

June 30, 2005


ORDER


Plaintiffs Marie Moss, Olin Clay III, and Marcus Miller, raise claims for race discrimination, hostile work environment (Moss and Clay), and retaliation (Clay and Miller) against Defendants United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and United Parcel Services of America, Inc. Defendants have moved for summary judgment, and Plaintiffs have responded. For the reasons set out in the accompanying memorandum and opinion, the Court GRANTS summary judgment as to Clay's claims and Miller's claims. The Court GRANTS summary judgment as to Moss's hostile environment claim, but DENIES it as to Moss's disparate treatment claim, specifically, regarding Moss's transfer to the Wadsworth facility as a pre-load clerk.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Clay v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jun 30, 2005
Case No. 5:04-CV-1262, [Resolving Doc. No. 33, 37] (N.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2005)
Case details for

Clay v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Olin Clay III et al., Plaintiffs, v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

Case No. 5:04-CV-1262, [Resolving Doc. No. 33, 37] (N.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2005)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. CCL Custom Manufacturing Inc.

"Where the harassment is allegedly committed by a supervisor with immediate authority over the victim, the…

Amos v. McNairy Cnty.

Indeed, courts in this Circuit have found otherwise. See Sams v. Northcoast Behavioral Health Care Ctr., No.…