Clay v. State

Full title: Timothy Clay, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 19, 2015

461 S.W.3d 453 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 77426.

2015-05-19

Timothy Clay, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Mark Grothoff , Columbia, MO Counsel for Appellant. Richard Starnes , Jefferson City, MO Counsel for Respondent.

Per Curiam:

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri Honorable James Dale Youngs, Judge.
Mark Grothoff, Columbia, MO Counsel for Appellant. Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO Counsel for Respondent.
Before Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Timothy Clay, Jr., appeals the denial of a 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call the codefendant to corroborate a self-defense theory. He also claims appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file surveillance video exhibits to support the insufficiency of evidence argument. We affirm.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).