Opinion
No. 17-2239
05-29-2018
Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Riley Holmes, Sr., Cheryl H. Ledbetter, GIBBS & HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-03038-DCN) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Riley Holmes, Sr., Cheryl H. Ledbetter, GIBBS & HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Leonard L. Clay appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Clay's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Clay has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED