From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. Internal Revenue Ser

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 25, 2010
399 F. App'x 788 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1456.

Submitted: October 19, 2010.

Decided: October 25, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00681-WO-PTS).

Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay, Appellants Pro Se. Teresa E. McLaughlin, Laurie Allyn Snyder, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district court's orders dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, their action challenging their federal income tax liability, as well as their motions for reconsideration and recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00681-WO-PTS, 2009 WL 3391577 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2009); 2010 WL 4489368 (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Clay v. Internal Revenue Ser

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 25, 2010
399 F. App'x 788 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Clay v. Internal Revenue Ser

Case Details

Full title:Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 788 (4th Cir. 2010)