From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-18

In the Matter of Daniel CLAY, Petitioner, v. Brian S. FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Daniel Clay, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Daniel Clay, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding after he was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting smuggling. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Petitioner provides nothing to support his assertion that he is entitled to any additional relief and, thus, the proceeding is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Santiago v. Fischer, 101 A.D.3d 1206, 1206, 954 N.Y.S.2d 505 [2012] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clay v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Clay v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Daniel CLAY, Petitioner, v. Brian S. FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2616
962 N.Y.S.2d 918