From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. Fairfield Police Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 30, 2008
NO. CIV. S-08-573 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-08-573 LKK/KJM.

October 30, 2008


ORDER


Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). According to Local Rule 72-305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge.

The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. All future documents filed in the above-captioned case shall reference the following case number: No. Civ. S-08-573 KJM./s/ Lawrence K. Karlton

DATED: October 30, 2008 LAWRENCE K. KARLTON SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.


Summaries of

Clay v. Fairfield Police Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 30, 2008
NO. CIV. S-08-573 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Clay v. Fairfield Police Department

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CLAY, Plaintiff, v. FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

NO. CIV. S-08-573 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)