From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. Chinnock

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
May 25, 2005
Case No. 1:05 CV 957 (N.D. Ohio May. 25, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05 CV 957.

May 25, 2005


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER


On April 12, 2005, plaintiff pro se Larry Major Clay, an inmate at the Lake Erie Correctional Institution, filed this civil rights action against 10 defendants. Plaintiff also filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis on that date. For the reasons stated below, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

28 U.S.C. § 1915, which governs proceedings in forma pauperis, was amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub.L. No. 104-40, § 1(a), 110 Stat. 1327 (1996). Among the changes to the statute is a provision which prevents a prisoner from bringing a civil action or appealing a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis if, on three or more prior occasions, the prisoner brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it was frivolous, malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Clay has on at least three occasions filed a civil action failing to state a claim in this court. See, Clay v. State of Ohio, No. 5:04 CV 2264; Clay v. Hoffer, No. 1:97 CV 2269; and Clay v. Hoffer, No. 5:95 CV 1241. Thus, as the complaint in the instant action does not contain allegations reasonably suggesting he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, he may not proceed in forma pauperis. SeeMitchell v. Tennessee, No. 03-5816, 2004 WL 193153 at *1 (6th Cir. Jan. 30, 2004).

Failure to exhaust administrative remedies constitutes a failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.Baxter v. Rose, 305 F.3d 486, 489 (6th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Clay v. Chinnock

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
May 25, 2005
Case No. 1:05 CV 957 (N.D. Ohio May. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Clay v. Chinnock

Case Details

Full title:LARRY MAJOR CLAY, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM F. CHINNOCK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: May 25, 2005

Citations

Case No. 1:05 CV 957 (N.D. Ohio May. 25, 2005)