From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clawson v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 21, 2009
No. CV-07-02284-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Dec. 21, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-07-02284-PHX-FJM.

December 21, 2009


ORDER


The court has before it petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1), respondents' answer (doc. 14), petitioner's traverse (doc. 16), and the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the petition be denied (doc. 22). No objection to the report and recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired.

After review, the court accepts the recommended decision of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. We deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Next, we determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability. Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the petition's denial is justified by a plain procedural bar, and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Moreover, briefing on whether a certificate should issue would not be helpful. Therefore, we deny a certificate of appealability.

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk shall substitute Charles L. Ryan, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, for respondent Dora B. Schriro.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Clawson v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 21, 2009
No. CV-07-02284-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Dec. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Clawson v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Steven F. Clawson, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 21, 2009

Citations

No. CV-07-02284-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Dec. 21, 2009)